Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291783›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

metaAPA: a tool for integration of PolyA site predictions from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Qian Zhao, Magnus Rattray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qian ZhaoDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6386-0868
Magnus RattrayDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-5565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Single-cell 3'-tagging sequencing, such as that provided by 10x Genomics, can be used to study alternative polyadenylation (APA). APA can affect RNA function, stability, and subcellular localization, thereby influencing development and disease processes. Computational tools based on various algorithms, such as Sierra, polyApipe, and SCAPE, have been developed to infer polyA site positions from scRNA-seq data. However, these methods exhibit significant differences in the number of predicted sites and positional inconsistencies in the sites identified for the same gene, leading to divergent conclusions when analyzing the same data with different tools. Results: We designed two strategies to integrate the outputs of alternative APA tools, enabling users to select appropriate polyA site sets based on their specific needs. Our method can be used to extract high-confidence sites, supported by all tools, as well as putative sites supported by a subset of tools. We find that tools with high sensitivity for detecting APA sites can be usefully augmented by tools with higher positional accuracy but lower sensitivity. We show that our method obtains the expected number of high-confidence sites and that these sites exhibit the expected biological sequence characteristics. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/ManchesterBioinference/metaAPA.

Identifiers

PMID42291783
PMCPMC13259596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.