Evidence mapPaperPMID 42292582Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2026

Menopause symptom awareness research across the globe: a scoping review.

E Williams, L Terry, M Lindeman, M E Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E WilliamsSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
L TerrySchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
M LindemanSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
M E WrightCardiff University Brain Imaging Research Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Menopause is a major global health burden that directly impacts the wellbeing of half the population. Menopause is associated with a range of psychological, vasomotor, somatic and urogynocological symptoms that impact quality-of-life and day-to-day functioning. Despite this, it is still an under-discussed and taboo topic internationally, with women reporting a lack of understanding and social support, which in turn worsens the symptom experience. A lack of awareness or knowledge of menopause symptoms is a barrier to effective and understanding social support. Therefore, it is important that not only those going through menopause have awareness of symptoms, but those within their social and professional networks. To ease the global impact of menopausal symptoms, a vital step is raising awareness and encouraging social support. This scoping review aims to map current research into menopause symptom awareness across the world, sampling all ages and genders in the non-medical general public in low- to high-income countries. Methods: Online databases were used to identify eligible studies up to June 2025, of which 84 were selected for the final sample. Results and discussion: Prevalence of research across the world is mapped and underrepresented areas are highlighted, including non-female samples, low-income countries, and assessment of ocular symptom knowledge. This work will inform and highlight priority areas for future research and awareness campaigns. Systematic Review Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CT5V6.

Indexed as

internationalmenopausescoping reviewsymptom awarenessunderrepresented

Identifiers

PMID42292582
PMCPMC13253697

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.