ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound
Comments and illustrations on the complementary use of contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound in cardiac tumors.
Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary cardiac tumors are rare, accounting for less than 0.1% of all neoplasms, whereas secondary cardiac involvement is considerably more frequent, particularly in advanced oncological disease. Although imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography are routinely used for the diagnosis and characterization of cardiac masses, the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has not yet been systematically evaluated. CEUS enables real-time visualization of vascularity and perfusion and offers important advantages for distinguishing tumors from thrombi, characterizing benign and malignant lesions, and detecting embolic sequelae in distant organs. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathology, and clinical presentation of cardiac tumors and provide an overview of imaging strategies with a particular focus on CEUS. We illustrate the application of CEUS in the assessment of benign tumors such as myxomas and papillary fibroelastomas, rare benign entities, malignant cardiac tumors including sarcomas and lymphomas, and secondary cardiac involvement due to metastatic disease. The diagnostic value of CEUS is highlighted through image and video examples, demonstrating its ability to delineate perfused versus non-perfused tissue and to differentiate tumor vascularity patterns. CEUS represents a promising and underutilized imaging technique in the evaluation of cardiac tumors. It complements established imaging modalities, provides unique pathophysiological insights, and has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.