SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Dose-dependent adverse events of esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study systematically evaluated the safety profile of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression through a meta-analysis, focusing on dose-dependent adverse events and associated risk factors to inform precision dosing. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Mainland China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating esketamine for treatment-resistant depression were included. Primary outcomes included the incidence of adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, and clinical response or remission. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1, with subgroup analyses by dosage, administration route, and geographic region (Mainland China vs. International multi-regional). Results: Nine randomized controlled trials involving 1,449 patients were included. Dosages ranged from 28 to 84 mg for nasal spray and 0.20-0.40 mg/kg for intravenous injection. Esketamine significantly increased the risk of nine adverse events, including nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, elevated blood pressure, and somnolence, compared with controls (P < 0.05). Risks were strongly dose-dependent: the high-dose group (≥56 mg or 0.40 mg/kg) showed a greater risk than the low-dose group (≤28 mg or 0.20 mg/kg), with RR for nausea of 3.72 versus 1.69 and RR for dissociation of 10.65 versus 3.27. Patients in International multi-regional studies also had higher risks of nausea, somnolence, and headache than those in Mainland China studies. Although esketamine improved the clinical response rate (RR = 1.94), it increased treatment discontinuation due to adverse events by 2.22-fold (P = 0.025). Discussion: Esketamine improves symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression but significantly increases dose-dependent adverse events. Clinical use should adopt personalized dosing strategies that balance efficacy and tolerability based on individual patient profiles. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1024830, identifier CRD420251024830.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.