ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: targeting the powerhouse with nanomedicine.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by relentless cognitive decline. Despite decades of research dominated by the amyloid and tau hypotheses, clinical interventions targeting these classical hallmarks have yielded limited success in halting disease progression, underscoring a critical conceptual and therapeutic gap: the early, persistent, and under-addressed role of mitochondrial dysfunction as a primary driver of AD pathology. Beyond serving as passive victims of amyloid-beta toxicity, impaired mitochondria actively initiate and perpetuate a self-amplifying cycle through dysregulated bioenergetics, aberrant dynamics, compromised quality control, calcium dyshomeostasis, and exacerbated neuroinflammation-all of which collectively propel synaptic loss and neuronal death well before overt plaque deposition. This review provides a synthesized reappraisal of this mitochondrial-centric paradigm, systematically delineating the interconnected nature of mitochondrial failure as both an initiator and an amplifier of AD and arguing that it represents a central nexus linking sporadic and genetic forms of the disease. We further consolidate the emerging landscape of nanomedicine as a revolutionary strategy to bridge the current therapeutic gap, highlighting how diverse nanotherapeutic platforms-ranging from organic and inorganic nanocarriers and biomimetic vesicles to nanozymes and gene-modulating systems-are uniquely equipped to overcome the blood-brain barrier and achieve subcellular precision targeting of the mitochondrial compartment. By analyzing advances in nanotechnology designed explicitly to restore mitochondrial homeostasis through the normalization of redox balance, enhancement of mitophagy, and preservation of adenosine triphosphate synthesis, we demonstrate how this approach directly addresses the root of the neurodegenerative cascade that traditional drug development has failed to reach. Finally, we critically examine the translational hurdles and future trajectories of mitochondria-targeted nanotherapy, proposing a conceptual framework for multidisciplinary integration and arguing that mitochondrial nanomedicine represents not merely a symptomatic intervention but a requisite disease-modifying paradigm shift capable of intercepting the earliest triggers of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.