ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Navigating dose-effect complexities and challenges in cannabinoid therapy for aging-related neurobiological changes.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence shows that brain aging is a time-dependent process, with very complex underlying mechanisms at molecular and cellular levels. The endocannabinoid system has emerged as a key regulator of brain homeostasis during aging, interfacing with neuroinflammation, neurogenesis, and blood-brain barrier integrity. However, the neurological impact of exogenous cannabinoids in the aging brain remains incompletely defined and often polarized between neuroprotective and neurodisruptive interpretations. This is a narrative review that critically synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence on the age-dependent effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), with particular emphasis on dose, route of administration, and pharmacokinetic constraints imposed by aging. Available data indicate that THC exhibits a dual, dose-dependent profile, with low-dose exposure engaging adaptive or potentially neuroprotective mechanisms, whereas moderate to high doses, especially following parenteral administration, are associated with glial activation, neuroinflammatory signaling, and functional impairment. In contrast, CBD demonstrates a seemingly favorable neurological profile in aging models, characterized by anti-neuroinflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects, largely independent of CB1R activation. Our findings support the idea that THC and THC predominant therapies may exert a dual effect in the aging brain of experimental models. A similar duality appears to emerge for CBD, particularly with respect to developmental effects, despite insufficient evidence. Collectively, these findings underscore the need for age-adapted, cannabinoid-specific dosing strategies and integrative experimental frameworks to accurately define the therapeutic potential and limitations of cannabinoids in age-associated neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.