Evidence mapPaperPMID 42293085Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

Unraveling the emerging role of glial heterogeneity in neuropathic pain: from pathological mechanisms to therapeutic Frontiers.

Zhiwei Li, Jiafeng Lu, Zhonghua Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiwei LiSchool of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Jiafeng Lu *Medical Research Center, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Zhonghua Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP) arises from injury or dysfunction within the somatosensory nervous system and represents a major clinical challenge due to its complex and multifactorial pathogenesis. Emerging evidence underscores that the onset and maintenance of NP are not solely governed by neuronal mechanisms but are critically shaped by the persistent activation and inherent heterogeneity of glial cells. Glial heterogeneity encompasses diverse molecular phenotypes, functional states, and distinct spatial distributions. Within the central nervous system (CNS), microglia and astrocytes undergo dynamic phenotypic transitions, contributing to both neurotoxic and neuroprotective effects by modulating neuroinflammatory cascades. In the peripheral nervous system, satellite glial cells actively sensitize sensory neurons through enhanced intercellular communication and the release of specific mediators, thereby facilitating the development and persistence of NP. The coordinated actions of heterogeneous glial populations drive key pathological processes-including synaptic remodeling, sustained neuroinflammation, and dysregulation of ion channels-ultimately promoting peripheral and central sensitization. Importantly, emerging therapeutic strategies targeting distinct glial subpopulations or their specific activation states, such as P2X4 receptor antagonists or NF-κB inhibitors, have shown promise beyond conventional neuron-centric approaches. This review synthesizes current insights into glial heterogeneity in NP, addressing a critical gap in the literature and providing a framework for advancing mechanism-based clinical interventions.

Indexed as

cell communicationglial cell heterogeneityneuroinflammationneuropathic painpain regulation

Identifiers

PMID42293085
PMCPMC13253439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.