ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Bidirectional regulatory effects of exercise on emotional eating in depression: an ERP-based narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise intervention modulates food reward in obesity: efficacy, mechanisms, and prospects.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is frequently accompanied by emotional eating (EE). However, existing research has largely reduced EE to excessive food intake, overlooking the two opposing phenotypes within depressive populations: emotional overeating (EOE) and emotional undereating (EUE). Furthermore, self-report measures are limited in capturing the dynamic neural processes triggered by negative emotions. To address these issues, this narrative review integrated event-related potential (ERP) evidence from studies on depression, EE, and exercise interventions. The neural characteristics of the two EE phenotypes were compared across multiple processing stages, including attentional allocation, conflict monitoring, inhibitory control, and reward processing. The synthesized evidence suggests that EOE may be characterized by exaggerated reward responsiveness coupled with deficient inhibitory control, whereas EUE is marked by attenuated reward processing accompanied by excessive conflict monitoring. To mitigate inferential risks from cross-population and cross-task integration, the reviewed evidence was hierarchically stratified according to inferential distance, and model conclusions were explicitly bounded. Based on this framework, we propose a bidirectional regulatory model in which exercise is hypothesized to modulate neural homeostasis in a baseline-dependent manner. Within this hypothesis-generating framework, exercise may primarily affect putative EOE-related profiles by supporting cognitive control processes and attenuating the motivational salience of food cues, whereas it may affect putative EUE-related profiles by potentially supporting reward responsiveness and attenuating excessive monitoring. These proposed pathways remain to be tested in phenotype-stratified ERP intervention studies. Future research should implement phenotype-stratified randomized controlled exercise trials combined with emotion-induced food-related ERP tasks to test the model predictions and advance personalized intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.