Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293376›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Floor-Hugging intervention: findings from an exploratory study of a novel floor-exposure and post-fall contingency program.

Shashank Ghai

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shashank GhaiDepartment of Political, Historical, Religious and Cultural Studies, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Falls constitute a significant public health burden across the adult lifespan, affecting both working-age and older populations and compromising functional independence and quality of life through physical and psychological consequences. Current interventions typically address these dimensions in isolation, emphasizing fall avoidance rather than equipping individuals to manage and recover from falls when they occur. Methods: This exploratory study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the Floor-Hugging Intervention (Floor-HI), a novel multicomponent program that combines controlled exposure to fall-risk environments with systematic training in post-fall recovery skills, including floor-to-standing transitions, fall imagination, and role-playing scenarios. Eight community-dwelling, middle-aged adults (3 males, 5 females; aged 31-55 years) completed a 3-week program. Outcomes including concern of falling, postural control, floor-rise ability, turning ability, and health-related quality of life were assessed at four time points (Weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9). Results: Recruitment, retention, and adherence rates were 100%, 89%, and 100%, respectively. Significant improvements over time were observed in postural stability (Mini-BESTest, Discussion: Despite being limited by the absence of a control group and a small sample size, this study demonstrates that Floor-HI is feasible, acceptable, and safe in community-dwelling middle-aged adults. These findings provide a foundation for future feasibility and controlled trials to establish efficacy and applicability in populations with elevated fall risk.

Indexed as

concern of fallingfall managementfallsfloor rise traininghealthy ageing

Identifiers

PMID42293376
PMCPMC13260575

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.