ReviewBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Understanding Sex and Gender Effects on Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Clinical Presentation and Risk Factors.
Review in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit significant sex and gender differences in prevalence, clinical presentation, and risk factors. Males are diagnosed with ASD 4 times more frequently than females, and females show slightly higher OCD prevalence, though diagnostic biases may obscure true rates. Current diagnostic criteria predominantly reflect male phenotypes, contributing to underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in females who often camouflage symptoms and present with less stereotypical behaviors. Here, we examine sex and gender influences on these disorders across clinical presentation, genetic factors, and developmental risks. Beyond sex, we emphasize the understudied role of gender, including elevated prevalence in gender-diverse populations and the influence of gender norms on symptom expression. We examine how other sociodemographic factors, such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, can compound diagnostic disparities. Finally, we provide recommendations for reforming diagnostic criteria and clinical practice to better serve females, gender-diverse individuals, and marginalized populations. Overall, implementing sex- and gender-informed diagnostic practices is essential to reduce diagnostic delays, improve treatment outcomes, and ensure equitable care for all individuals affected by ASD and OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.