Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293571›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation2026

Multimodal Fusion of Structural and Diffusion MRI for Intelligence Prediction.

Ram Sapkota, Bishal Thapaliya, Jingyu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ram SapkotaTranslational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Bishal ThapaliyaTranslational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Jingyu LiuTranslational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

Frontal-thalamo-cerebellar circuitry of attention deficit via imaging-genetic-environmental analysesR01MH130595 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Shihao Ji, Jingyu Liu · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal neuroimaging fusion provides complementary insights into brain structure and/or function. However, effectively integrating features across modalities remains a challenging task. This study presents a deep learning-based multimodal fusion framework for predicting cognitive outcomes in children using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. We focus on two imaging modalities: gray matter (GM) density derived from structural MRI and white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from diffusion MRI. Modality-specific features were extracted using two separate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and subsequently integrated through three fusion strategies: simple concatenation, multi-head attention, and transformer encoder-based fusion. We evaluated both single-modality and multimodal models to assess the added value of integration. Experimental results demonstrate that direct feature concatenation achieves the highest predictive performance, surpassing attention-based and transformer-based fusion approaches, with a test correlation of 0.44. Furthermore, we employed guided Grad-CAM to localize GM and FA regions contributing to intelligence prediction, providing interpretable neurological insights into the model's decision-making process.

Indexed as

diffusion MRIfusionintelligencemulti-modalitystructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID42293571
PMCPMC13262964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.