Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293927›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Developing social and emotional competence in higher vocational education: effects on employability and perceptions of decent work.

Tongxin Zhang, Wenhua Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tongxin ZhangDepartment of Physical Education, Suzhou Polytechnic University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wenhua WeiSchool of Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social and emotional competence has become increasingly central in educational research due to its relevance for students' wellbeing, adaptability, and transitions from education to work. In higher vocational education, where programs are explicitly oriented toward labor market entry, the development of social and emotional competencies may play a critical role in shaping both employability-related outcomes and students' understanding of what constitutes decent and dignified work. However, little experimental research has examined how educational interventions targeting socioemotional competence influence vocational students' employability perceptions and expectations regarding decent work prior to labor market entry. The present study examined the effectiveness of a six-session experiential intervention designed to foster socioemotional capacities among students enrolled in Higher Vocational Education programs in China. Using a randomized controlled experimental design, participants were assigned to an intervention group or a waiting-list control group. Quantitative data were collected at three time points (pre-test, post-test, and 4-month follow-up) to assess employability and perceptions of Decent Work Standards. A manipulation check was administered to evaluate participants' engagement with the intervention. Results from mixed-design general linear models revealed significant Time × Group interaction effects for both employability and decent work perceptions. Students who participated in the intervention showed substantial improvements in both outcomes compared to the control group, and these gains were largely maintained at follow-up, with moderate-to-large effect sizes (η

Indexed as

Chinadecent workemployabilityintervention studysocial and emotional competencevocational education

Identifiers

PMID42293927
PMCPMC13260081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.