Evidence mapPaperPMID 42294045Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

DFU-GCNet: a global context-enhanced inception network for robust and interpretable diabetic foot ulcer classification.

Md Tofael Ahmed Bhuiyan, Md Abdur Rahman, Farzan Majeed Noori, Md Zia Uddin, Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Tofael Ahmed BhuiyanComputational Intelligence Lab, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Abdur RahmanComputational Intelligence Lab, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farzan Majeed NooriDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Md Zia UddinSustainable Communication Technologies Department, SINTEF Digital, Oslo, Norway.
Abdul Kadar Muhammad MasumDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are severe complications that cause frequent lower extremity amputations. Timely diagnosis is crucial for effective clinical management. Although deep learning approaches improve detection, the models often struggle to capture different lesion scales. Furthermore, opaque algorithmic decisions often lower medical trust. Therefore, this study introduces DFU-GCNet for robust and interpretable ulcer classification. Methods: The proposed architecture merges inception modules with global context blocks. This combination extracts multi-scale features from different wound sizes and simultaneously models broad spatial dependencies across tissue regions. Thus, it effectively distinguishes pathology from surrounding healthy skin. We evaluate this framework using the Kaggle DFU dataset. We integrate explainable AI techniques to ensure clinical transparency. GradCAM++, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations, and SHapley Additive exPlanations are used to provide high-resolution diagnostic heatmaps and confirm that the network prioritizes clinically relevant wound boundaries. Results: The model achieved a superior classification accuracy of 97.16%, with an F1-score of 0.9715 and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.9437. DFU-GCNet demonstrated decisive superiority compared with standardized modern baselines such as VGG16 and EfficientNet. Discussion: The findings indicate that DFU-GCNet is a highly reliable automated screening instrument.

Indexed as

deep learningDFU-GCNetdiabetic foot ulcerexplainable AI (XAI)global context attentionmedical image classification

Identifiers

PMID42294045
PMCPMC13253675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.