ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
DFU-GCNet: a global context-enhanced inception network for robust and interpretable diabetic foot ulcer classification.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are severe complications that cause frequent lower extremity amputations. Timely diagnosis is crucial for effective clinical management. Although deep learning approaches improve detection, the models often struggle to capture different lesion scales. Furthermore, opaque algorithmic decisions often lower medical trust. Therefore, this study introduces DFU-GCNet for robust and interpretable ulcer classification. Methods: The proposed architecture merges inception modules with global context blocks. This combination extracts multi-scale features from different wound sizes and simultaneously models broad spatial dependencies across tissue regions. Thus, it effectively distinguishes pathology from surrounding healthy skin. We evaluate this framework using the Kaggle DFU dataset. We integrate explainable AI techniques to ensure clinical transparency. GradCAM++, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations, and SHapley Additive exPlanations are used to provide high-resolution diagnostic heatmaps and confirm that the network prioritizes clinically relevant wound boundaries. Results: The model achieved a superior classification accuracy of 97.16%, with an F1-score of 0.9715 and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.9437. DFU-GCNet demonstrated decisive superiority compared with standardized modern baselines such as VGG16 and EfficientNet. Discussion: The findings indicate that DFU-GCNet is a highly reliable automated screening instrument.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.