ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Metabolic Syndrome-Kidney Stone Disease Comorbidity: The Role of Dietary Micronutrients.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop interpretable machine-learning models to predict the risk of metabolic syndrome-kidney stone disease (MetS-KSD) comorbidity based on dietary micronutrient intake. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2018, 54 candidate features, including dietary variables and demographic covariates, were incorporated into the analysis. Six mainstream machine-learning models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and Naïve Bayes, were evaluated using a comprehensive multi-metric framework incorporating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR), accuracy, F-beta score, sensitivity, and specificity. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were applied to enhance model interpretability. A total of 4936 participants were included, representing approximately 4,597,435 U.S. adults with MetS-KSD comorbidity after application of sampling weights. After variance inflation factor analysis and Boruta feature selection, 33 features were retained, including 25 dietary micronutrients and 8 demographic variables. When demographic and dietary variables were jointly modeled, Random Forest demonstrated the best performance (AUC-ROC = 0.958; AUC-PR = 0.961). When models were constructed using dietary micronutrients alone, XGBoost achieved optimal performance (AUC-ROC = 0.956; AUC-PR = 0.960). SHAP and LIME analyses identified lycopene, added vitamin B12, magnesium, dietary fiber, theobromine, and vitamin K as key contributing features, with importance rankings varying according to demographic context. Supplementary sensitivity analyses further supported model robustness and the effectiveness of SMOTE-based imbalance correction. These findings suggest that interpretable machine learning may provide a useful framework for nutritional risk stratification in MetS-KSD comorbidity, although external validation in independent populations is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.