Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294384›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026

Advancements in sagittal alignment parameters and management of adult spine deformities.

Jordan A Bauer, Rohan Rajan, Rajendra Singh, Marissa Gedman, Alexander K Hahn, Jason Dacruz, Hanbing Zhou, Cameron Kia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordan A BauerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Rohan RajanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Rajendra SinghDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Marissa GedmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Alexander K HahnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jason DacruzOrthopedic Associates of Hartford, Hartford Hospital Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT, USA.
Hanbing ZhouOrthopedic Associates of Hartford, Hartford Hospital Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT, USA.
Cameron KiaOrthopedic Associates of Hartford, Hartford Hospital Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is increasingly recognized as a condition in which sagittal alignment plays a role in pain, disability, and mechanical failure. Historically, sagittal correction strategies relied on global radiographic parameters such as sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. While these measures demonstrated important associations with health-related quality of life, they incompletely account for compensated deformities, segmental mechanics, and directionality of correction. Over the past decade, alignment planning has evolved toward more individualized frameworks that incorporate pelvic morphology, age, segmental lordosis distribution, and direction-sensitive metrics. Outcome-derived strategies, such as age-adjusted alignment targets, have contributed valuable insights but remain controversial and are not universally accepted as definitive sagittal goals. Radiographic parameters, including the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA) and T4-L1-hip axis, provide reproducible, intraoperatively modifiable feedback and improved prediction of mechanical failure risk when applied with appropriate clinical context. This review synthesizes the evolution of sagittal alignment strategies in ASD, highlighting the strengths and limitations of historical global metrics, age-adjusted frameworks, and emerging vector-based and segmental alignment concepts. Emphasis is placed on integrated, patient-specific approaches that balance global, segmental, and directional parameters to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

Adult spinal deformity (ASD)lumbar lordosis (LL)pelvic incidence (PI)proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK)sagittal alignment

Identifiers

PMID42294384
PMCPMC13263570

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.