ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Predictive value of NRI, NLR, PLR and LMR for therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in advanced rectal cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the study was to investigate the predictive value of the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) for the prognosis and effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 172 advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy (Feb 2020 - Feb 2023) was performed. The optimal cut-off values of each indicator were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The Results: The optimal cut-off values of NLR, PLR, LMR, NRI were 2.50, 142.23, 3.92, 50.45. Efficacy analysis revealed that the ORR and DCR in the low NLR, low PLR, high LMR, and high NRI groups were significantly higher than those in the corresponding groups (all Conclusion: These indicators correlate with immunotherapy efficacy/prognosis. Among them, NLR≥2.50 is an independent biomarker for poor efficacy and prognosis, providing references for clinical treatment individualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.