Evidence mapPaperPMID 42294499Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026

Turning back time: a comprehensive list of interventions that decrease next-generation epigenetic aging clocks in humans.

Adiv A Johnson, David A Sinclair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adiv A JohnsonTally Health, New York, NY, United States.
David A SinclairPaul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research, Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic aging clocks estimate age from DNA methylation patterns and have become central tools in longevity research. More recently, next-generation clocks have been developed to better compensate for the known divergence between chronological age and epigenetic age in ways that relate to lifestyle, health, and age-related disease. Although epigenetic clocks represent investigational biomarkers, these newer models are more strongly associated with all-cause mortality risk than first-generation clocks. As such, interventions that modify them are of interest. To test this, we performed a series of systematic searches and identified 41 human studies reporting the effects of interventions on at least one next-generation epigenetic clock. Our data suggest that a diverse range of pharmaceutical, lifestyle, supplementation, non-pharmaceutical clinical, and psychosocial interventions can decrease epigenetic age, including exercise, a plant-rich diet, the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide, caloric restriction, ketamine, omega-3 fatty acids, a multivitamin-multimineral supplement, umbilical cord plasma, and the cholesterol-lowering drug pitavastatin. Nicotinamide riboside, rapamycin, senolytics, and several other interventions showed no detectable effect, whereas plasmapheresis and other therapeutics accelerated epigenetic aging. We also summarize reported effect sizes and compare next-generation clocks with respect to their frequency of use and responsiveness to intervention.

Indexed as

aging biomarkerbiohorologyclinical trialsepigenetic age reversalepigenetic aging clocknext-generation clock

Identifiers

PMID42294499
PMCPMC13258529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.