ArticlePlant, cell & environment2026
Antioxidants Differentially Regulate Non-Photochemical Quenching.
Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antioxidants Differentially Regulate Non-Photochemical Quenching.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) dissipates excess light energy as heat, limiting reactive oxygen species production during photosynthesis. Exogenous antioxidants are widely reported to improve plant performance under stress, yet their impacts on NPQ are inconsistent across studies, complicating mechanistic interpretation. Here, we systematically compared six antioxidants - ascorbate, chitosan, coenzyme M, reduced glutathione, melatonin, and N-acetyl cysteine - applied to Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings using individual concentration gradients, under standardised pH and illumination regimes. Antioxidants produced strong, divergent, and context-dependent shifts in NPQ kinetics. Coenzyme M most strongly suppressed NPQ, decreasing induction rate, maximum, and relaxation rate, whereas melatonin and N-acetyl cysteine generally enhanced NPQ maximum or relaxation and ascorbate uniquely accelerated NPQ induction. These effects changed at longer times post application. Using psbs, vde and zep null mutants, we show that short term ascorbate and coenzyme M NPQ effects require canonical NPQ components. The major contributor to their effects were opposing regulation of the xanthophyll cycle: ascorbate enhanced, while coenzyme M suppressed, light-driven violaxanthin de-epoxidation and altered xanthophyll flux during recovery. These data demonstrate two antioxidant-specific mechanisms, confirming their specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.