Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294597›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Exposure to false cardiac feedback alters pain perception and anticipatory cardiac frequency.

Eleonora Parrotta, Patric Bach, Giovanni Pezzulo, Andrea Zaccaro, Mauro Gianni Perrucci, Marcello Costantini, Francesca Ferri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleonora ParrottaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-8566
Patric BachSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-2080
Giovanni PezzuloInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6813-8282
Andrea ZaccaroDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-7132
Mauro Gianni PerrucciDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Marcello CostantiniInstitute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies ‑ ITAB, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Francesca FerriDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

European Research Council 10.3030/820213European Union's Horizon 2020 10.3030/945539European Union's Horizon 2020 10.3030/952215Leverhulme Trust RPG-2019-248the PNRR MUR PE0000013-FAIR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of pain, like other interoceptive processes, has recently been conceptualized in terms of predictive coding and free energy frameworks. In these views, the brain integrates sensory, proprioceptive, and interoceptive signals to generate probabilistic inferences about upcoming events, which shape both the state and the perception of our inner body. Here, we ask whether it is possible to induce pain expectations by providing false faster (vs. slower) acoustic cardiac feedback before administering electrical cutaneous shocks. We test whether these expectations will shape both the perception of pain and the body's physiological state toward prior predictions. Results confirmed that faster cardiac feedback elicited pain expectations that affected both perceptual pain judgments and the body's physiological response. Perceptual pain judgments were biased toward the expected level of pain, such that participants illusorily perceived identical noxious stimuli as more intense and unpleasant. Physiological changes mirrored the predicted level of pain, such that participants' actual cardiac response in anticipation of pain stimuli showed a deceleration in heart rate, in line with the well-known orienting cardiac response in anticipation of threatening stimuli (Experiment 1). In a control experiment, such perceptual and cardiac modulations were dramatically reduced when the feedback reproduced an exteroceptive, instead of interoceptive, cardiac feedback (Experiment 2). These findings show that cardiac perception can be understood as interoceptive inference that modulates both our perception and the physiological state of the body, thereby actively generating the interoceptive and autonomic consequences that have been predicted.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalHeart RatePain PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbayesian inferencecardiac feedbackhumaninteroceptive illusionneurosciencepain perceptionpredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID42294597
PMCPMC13268646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.