ReviewHerz2026
[The cardiovascular exposome: areas of action for prevention and practical cardiology].
Review in Herz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental risk factors are recognized as essential determinants of the cardiovascular disease burden but are still poorly represented in clinical guidelines. External environmental exposures such as air pollution, traffic noise, heat, light pollution, chemical contamination of soil and water as well as urban planning, our social environment and lifestyle contribute significantly to the global disease burden and premature deaths. In particular, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are significantly influenced by these environmental stressors. The exposome concept provides an overarching framework for this by associating lifelong external exposures with changes in biological processes such as oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, vascular damage, metabolic dysregulation, disturbances of circadian regulation, our circadian clock, and the resulting chronic diseases and deaths. Environmental exposures not only increase the risk of chronic diseases in healthy individuals but also amplify classic risk factors, worsen the prognosis for vulnerable groups, and thus open concrete prevention and intervention opportunities in outpatient and inpatient care. Practicing cardiologists can systematically integrate environmental exposures into medical history taking, identify particularly at-risk individuals, recommend behavior-related protective measures, work interdisciplinarily with general practitioners and occupational physicians, and at the same time advocate for heart-healthier living environments in health policy. This review summarizes the current evidence on the impact of the exposome on cardiovascular health and derives recommendations for cardiologists from it. The goal is to view the exposome from the perspective of daily care: from risk stratification to patient-centered interventions to structural measures at the level of practice, clinic, and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42295332What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.