Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295385›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy with 1-Day Hospitalization: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction.

Pablo Boldrini, Gabriel Vallejos, Valentin Manríquez, Consuelo Dinamarca, Vicente Naser, Michel Naser

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo BoldriniHospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Piso Pélvico Femenino, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar (Ex Santos Dumont) 999 Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile. pablo.boldrini@usach.cl.
Gabriel VallejosHospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Piso Pélvico Femenino, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar (Ex Santos Dumont) 999 Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile.
Valentin ManríquezHospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Piso Pélvico Femenino, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar (Ex Santos Dumont) 999 Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile.
Consuelo DinamarcaHospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Piso Pélvico Femenino, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar (Ex Santos Dumont) 999 Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile.
Vicente NaserFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Lira 40 Santiago, 8330023, Santiago, Chile.
Michel NaserHospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Unidad de Piso Pélvico Femenino, Dr. Carlos Lorca Tobar (Ex Santos Dumont) 999 Independencia, 8380456, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisSacrocolpopexy is the gold standard non-obliterative surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). While laparoscopy offers shorter hospital stays, open sacrocolpopexy with enhanced recovery protocols may achieve similar outcomes at lower cost. Evidence on patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction following open sacrocolpopexy with 1-day hospitalization remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate subjective effectiveness and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing open sacrocolpopexy with 1-day hospital stay.

methodsAn ambispective cohort study was conducted of 106 consecutive patients who underwent open sacrocolpopexy with planned 1-day discharge between January 2020 and December 2023 at two centers. Patients were contacted via telephone to complete a structured questionnaire incorporating validated items from the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8). On the basis of an expected satisfaction rate of 80% with 10% margin of error, aimed to obtain ≥ 62 respondents.

resultsSeventy-seven patients (72.6% response rate) completed the survey. The majority (92.2%, 95% CI 84.6-96.8%) reported no vaginal bulging sensation postoperatively. Symptom improvement or resolution was reported by 94.8% (95% CI 87.8-98.6%) of patients. Satisfaction with surgical results was 90.9% (95% CI 82.9-96.0%), and satisfaction with the surgical process was 92.2% (95% CI 84.6-96.8%). Additionally, 93.5% would choose the surgery again, and 90.9% would recommend it to others.

conclusionsOpen abdominal sacrocolpopexy with 1-day hospitalization demonstrates high subjective effectiveness and excellent patient satisfaction, representing a viable option particularly for resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgeryPatient-reported outcomesPatient satisfactionPelvic organ prolapseSacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID42295385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.