ArticleSurgery today2026
Timing and motivation behind the decision to become a surgeon: Gender and optimal recruitment insights.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to clarify the timing and motivations behind decisions to pursue a surgical career and identify optimal recruitment strategies.
methodsA nationwide questionnaire was administered to newly certified surgical trainees. Respondents were classified into two groups based on when they decided to pursue surgery: before junior residency (BJR) or during/after junior residency (DJR). The backgrounds and motivations were compared.
resultsAmong the 758 respondents (53.8%), 25.6% were female. Male trainees were more likely to decide to pursue surgery before medical school (18.7% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.003), whereas female trainees more often decided during their PGY-2 (35.4% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.002). The DJR group included more women (30.3% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.014) and residents from urban areas (46.6% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.008). The BJR group was more influenced by the images of surgeons and family. Among female residents, those in the DJR group were more influenced by recruitment from the surgeons.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated sex differences in the timing and motivation for pursuing a surgical career. Understanding the optimal timing and appealing factors for recruiting surgeons, particularly women, could inform more effective recruitment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.