Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295503›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026

From framework to practice: applying the proteus-practice framework to learn lessons for integrating PROs in clinical care.

Anne L R Schuster, Claire Snyder, Lotte Haverman, Jennifer R Cracchiolo, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Amy M Cizik, Alex Tarlochan Singh Sandhu, Michael Brundage, Norah L Crossnohere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne L R SchusterDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. anne.schuster@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4391-1712
Claire SnyderDepartments of Medicine, Oncology, and Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8952-4561
Lotte HavermanChild and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-0562
Jennifer R CracchioloHead and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Liv Marit Valen SchougaardAmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-2569
Amy M CizikDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4777-2617
Alex Tarlochan Singh SandhuDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael BrundageQueen's University Sinclair Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Norah L CrossnohereDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-1330

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI FRANCESCA M GANY · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Pfizer The PROTEUS Consortium is funded through independent education grants from Pfizer.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice expands, there is a growing need to understand how PROs are being integrated across diverse healthcare settings. We aimed to use the PROTEUS-Practice Framework to systematically describe real-world approaches to PRO integration into clinical care and identify lessons learned.

methodsParticipants in the international PROTEUS Consortium were invited to submit case studies describing PRO applications in clinical care. Contributors completed a structured template aligned with the PROTEUS-Practice Framework, which outlines 16 steps for PRO integration across design, implementation, and management stages. Case studies were descriptively summarized by framework step and responses were thematically analyzed by framework stage to identify lessons learned.

resultsFive case studies described the integration of PROs in diverse clinical contexts, including three within individual health systems and two spanning multiple health systems. Fifteen cross-cutting lessons learned emerged across the PROTEUS-Practice Framework stages. Themes identified in at least three case studies include the importance of stakeholder training during design, PRO champions during implementation, and EHR integration to support management. Clear goals, alignment of expected outcomes, iterative design processes, user-friendly visualizations, and regular system updates were also commonly emphasized as critical to successful integration.

conclusionThe PROTEUS-Practice Framework provided a structured approach for describing real-world approaches to PRO integration in clinical care. Its use enabled the identification of cross-cutting lessons learned that offer practical guidance for optimizing PRO integration and tailoring its use in diverse clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansClinical practiceImplementation sciencePatient-reported outcomesReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID42295503
PMCPMC13269287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.