ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Interventional radiology management of disc herniation: a narrative review.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disc herniation (DH) is a common cause of spinal pain and radiculopathy. While most patients improve with conservative treatment, cases with persistent symptoms may require further intervention. In this context, interventional radiology (IR) offers image-guided, percutaneous techniques as a minimally invasive therapeutic option in the stepwise management of DH. This narrative review, conducted in accordance with SANRA principles, analyses the diagnostic and therapeutic role of IR in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar DH. A structured literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus to identify studies evaluating mechanical, thermal, chemical, and regenerative approaches. Reported outcomes included pain relief, functional recovery, complication rates, and need for reintervention. Evidence suggests that percutaneous intradiscal procedures may achieve meaningful short- and medium-term clinical improvement in carefully selected patients with contained herniations and clinicoradiological concordance. These techniques are associated with reduced invasiveness, shorter recovery times, and lower complication rates when performed by experienced practitioners. Imaging plays a central role in diagnosis, patient selection, procedural planning, as well as technical accuracy and safety. Nonetheless, current evidence remains heterogeneous and largely based on observational studies, with limited long-term comparative data. Further multicentre prospective trials and standardized outcome reporting are required to better define indications and lasting effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42295588What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.