ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2026
Language model-based self-training reduces labeled data requirements by 99% for biological sequence classification.
Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of a biological sequence's function is an exploding field that could prove to be an invaluable tool in deciphering molecular mechanisms of diseases and genetic variation. However, existing techniques suffer from a very low number of experimentally verified labels as well as the complexity of modeling sequence context. Previous work only focuses on semi-supervised learning (SSL) or pre-trained language models (PLMs) individually and does not consider their complementarity: whereas PLMs capture syntactic conservatism and long-range dependency from huge unlabeled sequence data as features, SSL updates label-level certainty via confidence-weighted pseudo-label selection. To realize integrating these benefits, we make a creative use of PLMs as strong feature extractors to make the sequence semantics extracted, and meanwhile leverage the SSL to constrain the decision boundary by selecting reliable pseudo-labels. We show that our framework achieves competitive performance compared to full supervision while using far fewer labeled samples, on two biological prediction tasks: DNA-binding protein (DBP) and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) detection. In general, our approach, developed here, not only offers an efficient solution for discovering new DBP and ncRNA in low-resource settings where experimental verification is infeasible, but also lays a solid methodological foundation for biological sequence classification in computational biology. Key points Unlabeled data significantly improves model accuracy in semi-supervised learning. The language model-based self-training method outperforms traditional semi-supervised approaches like TSVM. It achieves competitive performance against state-of-the-art fully supervised methods, requiring only 1% labeled data for effective classification and accurately identifying novel biomolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.