Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296558›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

A Pilot mHealth Text Messaging Program Targeting Parents During the First 2000 Days: Nonrandomized Repeat Cross-Sectional Analysis to Evaluate Feasibility, Engagement, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness.

Jacklyn Jackson, Nayerra Hudson, Tessa Delaney, Alison L Brown, Sienna Kavalec, Jessica Pinfold, Rebecca Sewter, Hannah McCormick, Rebecca Liackman, Christophe Lecathelinais and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jacklyn JacksonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-0418
Nayerra HudsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-1564
Tessa DelaneySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0002-2756-4821
Alison L BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-7467
Sienna KavalecSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0009-0003-7605-4646
Jessica PinfoldHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-4308-9430
Rebecca SewterHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-4388-1334
Hannah McCormickHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-2157-244X
Rebecca LiackmanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0009-0008-0958-4598
Christophe LecathelinaisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-473X
Lynda DaviesHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2747-5589
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-3868
Daniel GroombridgeHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-6431
Belinda TullyHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-4626-7466
Sinead RedmanHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-8960-5568
Tauri SmartHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-9204-1788
Nafiseh GhafourniaHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7688-5138
Paul David CravenHunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-5343-0893
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia, 61 0249246499.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-7663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The first 2000 days can profoundly influence long-term health. Healthy Beginnings for Hunter New England Kids (HB4HNEKids) is an SMS text messaging program delivered alongside routine Child and Family Health Nursing (CFHN) care, which provides families with evidence-based, age- and stage-related preventive health information across the first 2000 days. Objective: This pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility, engagement, and acceptability of the HB4HNEKids program. It also aimed to explore the potential effectiveness of the program at 6 and/or 12 months post partum on outcomes including breastfeeding, child diet, child movement, and parental mental well-being. Methods: During the pilot phase (October 2021 to July 2024), project records were used to assess the number of families enrolled, number of SMS text messages sent (feasibility), and the number of opt outs (engagement). Repeat cross-sectional surveys were conducted at 5-7 months post partum and again at 12-14 months post partum using validated survey instruments. Using convenience sampling methods, survey participants consisted of birthing parents who had received HB4HNEKids and a concurrent nonrandomized comparison group that did not receive the program. Surveys assessed parental self-reported engagement with the messages, program acceptability, breastfeeding status, child diet, child movement, and parental mental well-being. Mixed linear regression analyses were conducted to calculate mean differences and odds ratios. Results: During the pilot phase, HB4HNEKids was delivered to 6243 families (73.4% of families contacted by CFHN). A total of 383 birthing parents completed the survey at 6 months (99/383, 26% receiving HB4HNEKids), and 283 completed the survey at 12 months (104/283, 37% receiving HB4HNEKids). Of the survey participants who received HB4HNEKids (n=200), between 76% and 83% reported that they always or very often read the SMS text messages, spending on average 5-7 minutes engaged with the content. At both survey time points, more than 90% of participants receiving HB4HNEKids agreed that the program was acceptable. Child daily intake of vegetables was significantly higher in the HB4HNEKids group (adjusted mean difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.40; P=.006) than in the comparison group at 12 months. Parents receiving HB4HNEKids also reported significantly better mental well-being scores (P=.005). While HB4HNEKids participants reported breastfeeding rates 5 percentage points greater than comparison participants at 6 and 12 months, this result was not statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences between HB4HNEKids, and comparison participant responses related to child movement behaviors. Conclusions: The HB4HNEKids SMS text messaging program is feasible to deliver at scale alongside routine CFHN care and is highly acceptable and engaging to parents. This pragmatic evaluation of the pilot, embedded into usual care, indicates potential effectiveness of the program for improving child vegetable intakes and parental mental well-being. Further evaluation of this program using robust methodology is needed to determine the effectiveness of this innovative mHealth program across the first 2000 days.

Indexed as

ParentsText MessagingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineacceptabilitychild healthcross-sectionaldigital healthfeasibilityfirst 2000 daysmHealthtext message

Identifiers

PMID42296558
PMCPMC13270169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.