ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Interpretable Whole-Breast Radiomic Biomarkers for Exploratory Assessment of HER2 + Breast Cancer in Digital Mammography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease whose molecular subtypes differ in biological behavior, prognosis, and therapeutic response. This study investigated whether whole-breast radiomic features extracted from digital mammograms and showing statistically significant differences between HER2 + tumors and other molecular subtypes or healthy controls could also provide discriminatory information for exploratory HER2 + characterization. An automated whole-breast segmentation and feature-extraction workflow, without manual lesion-centered delineation, was applied to the breast region to capture broader parenchymal and microenvironmental texture patterns while reducing dependence on manual lesion annotation. Intensity-based, first-order, and second-order texture features were extracted from DICOM mammograms, followed by pairwise statistical testing, false discovery rate correction, effect-size assessment, Gaussian distribution analysis, normalized feature visualization, univariate AUC analysis, and classifier evaluation using logistic regression and linear support vector machines. First-order and intensity-based descriptors showed limited subtype-specific value, whereas second-order texture features provided more informative discriminatory patterns. Among the evaluated feature families, GLCM and NGLDM descriptors showed the most coherent evidence across statistical, visual, and classifier-based analyses, with NGLDM yielding the broadest set of statistically significant features. Classification performance was strongest and most balanced for HER2 + versus healthy controls, while discrimination between HER2 + and other malignant molecular subtypes was modest, context-dependent, and affected by sensitivity-specificity imbalance in several models. Therefore, the present findings more strongly support sensitivity to malignancy-related whole-breast texture alterations than reliable HER2-specific classification among malignant subtypes. Whole-breast mammographic radiomics should be interpreted as an exploratory and complementary source of candidate imaging biomarkers for future validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42298097What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.