ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Digital phenotyping with large language models to detect depressive state changes in patients.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital phenotyping leverages continuous data from smartphones and wearable devices for real-time mental health monitoring, offering opportunities for early detection and personalized care in mood disorders by enabling clinicians to proactively respond to significant changes before symptoms worsen. However, the heterogeneity of such data presents modeling challenges. This study evaluates the potential of large language models (LLMs) to detect changes in depression severity from digital phenotyping data among individuals experiencing major depressive episodes. We compare in-context learning and fine-tuning strategies and find that both few-shot prompted and fine-tuned LLMs outperform traditional baselines. Furthermore, embedding-only and QLoRA fine-tuning yield comparable results, with the former excelling on individual features and the latter performing better on combined inputs. These findings demonstrate the promise of LLMs in integrating heterogeneous behavioral data for mental health analysis, while underscoring the importance of clinical validation and ethical safeguards in real-world applications.
Identifiers
42298144What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.