Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298243›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

Cultural and Structural Influences on Shared Decision-Making in the Care of Critically Ill Patients with Stroke in China: A Critical Realist Qualitative Study.

Hui Zhang, Carmel Davies, Chunhai Su, Deirdre O'Donnell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui ZhangNursing Department, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, No. 269 Mengzi Avenue, High-Tech Zone, Jining City, 272000, China. hui.zhang2@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1771-3069
Carmel DaviesSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Chunhai SuNursing Department, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, No. 269 Mengzi Avenue, High-Tech Zone, Jining City, 272000, China.
Deirdre O'DonnellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is widely recommended for critically ill patients with stroke receiving neurocritical care owing to prognostic uncertainty and the high-stakes nature of treatment decisions. However, SDM is shaped by sociocultural and healthcare system contexts, and evidence from non-Western settings remains limited. This study examined how contextual factors influence SDM practices in the care of critically ill patients with stroke in China.

methodsUnderpinned by critical realism (CR), this interpretive qualitative study was conducted at a major tertiary medical center in central China. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in caring for critically ill patients with stroke. Data were analyzed using Fryer's CR approach to thematic analysis to identify patterns in decision-making practices and develop explanatory interpretations of underlying contextual mechanisms.

resultsParticipants described decision-making discussions with families as dynamic and strategically navigated interactions. One participant likened this communication approach to "practicing Tai Chi," reflecting clinicians' efforts to adapt communication and manage responsibility during high-stakes decisions. The analysis identified seven recurring decision-making patterns, including family dominance, limited patient involvement, the influence of family relationships, and the central role of financial considerations. Two broader contextual mechanisms were identified: a cultural mechanism emphasizing family authority in medical decisions, and structural influences associated with a market-embedded healthcare system that shape trust, accountability concerns, and financial constraints.

conclusionsIn this setting, SDM practices were strongly shaped by sociocultural and structural conditions, resulting in decision-making processes characterized by family-led decisions, limited patient participation, and cautious clinician engagement. These findings prompt reflection on the culturally contingent nature of SDM processes that take different forms across healthcare contexts. This underscores the importance of developing context-sensitive approaches to SDM in neurocritical care.

Indexed as

Critical realismCultureHealthcare systemNeurocritical careQualitative studyShared decision-makingStroke

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.