ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Deep learning-based natural language processing for critical care identification in pediatric emergency department.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe initial assessment of pediatric emergency patients is challenging due to diverse clinical presentations and the limited applicability of existing mortality scoring systems that require detailed laboratory results often unavailable at first encounter. Deep learning (DL)-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers the ability to extract complex patterns within textual data attained at the first encounter with the physician and can enhance the accuracy and timely prediction of critically ill patients in the Pediatric emergency department (PED). This study identified whether DL-based NLP techniques, which integrate structured data (vital signs) with unstructured data (clinical text written by physicians), can accurately identify patients requiring critical care in PEDs.
methodsFour machine learning (ML) models using term frequency-inverse document frequency-logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting, gradient boosting, and random forest, and two DL-based NLP models based on the Korean Medical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (KM-BERT) framework were tested on 87,748 children, including 599 (0.7%) critical cases and 14,095 (16.1%) admission cases in a tertiary hospital, from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021.
resultsKM-BERT, using a Masked Language Model (MLM), outperformed all ML-based models in predicting critically ill patients, achieving the highest Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) of 0.941 ± 0.015 and an accuracy of 0.952 ± 0.002. It also demonstrated superior performance in predicting hospitalized patients, with an AUROC of 0.879 ± 0.004 and an accuracy of 0.798 ± 0.002.
conclusionThese findings suggest that DL-based NLP approaches, particularly KM-BERT with MLM, may improve the early identification of critically ill and hospitalized pediatric patients in the PED compared with conventional ML-based models. Further prospective, multi-center studies are required to validate these findings and establish their suitability for routine clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.