Evidence mapPaperPMID 42298491Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2026

Association of HA130/KHA80 hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis with survival outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a time-dependent and propensity score-matched analysis.

Yan Liu, Wei Gang, Wei Chen, Limei Yang, Rui Dong, Zhiyong Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan Liu *Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei Gang *Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Limei YangDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Rui DongDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. drdongr@163.com.
Zhiyong GuoDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. drguozhiyong@163.com.

Funding

Shanghai Xinxin Medical Technology Development Foundation KY-HXZ-20240511-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) experience a high mortality burden, with cardiovascular disease remaining a major cause of death. This study aimed to evaluate the association between adjunctive hemoperfusion combined with conventional hemodialysis (HD + HP) and long-term survival outcomes in patients receiving MHD.

methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shanghai Changhai Hospital. Patients with end-stage renal disease who received MHD between January 2015 and December 2023 were retrospectively identified from the center's hemodialysis records. Among the 640 eligible patients, 419 (65.5%) received HD during the study period, whereas 221 (34.5%) received adjunctive HP in addition to HD. HP exposure was modeled as a time-varying covariate in a multivariable time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model to account for treatment timing. A marginal structural model (MSM) using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was further constructed to address measured time-dependent confounding. Propensity score matching was performed as a sensitivity analysis using 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, with a caliper width of 0.02. Survival outcomes in the matched cohort were evaluated using Simon-Makuch curves and Mantel-Byar tests.

resultsAmong the 640 included MHD patients, the median age was 67.5 years, 66.9% were male, and the median dialysis vintage was 48.0 months. During follow-up, 348 patients died, corresponding to all-cause mortality proportion of 54.4% in the study sample. Diabetic kidney disease was the most common primary renal disease (30.9%), followed by chronic glomerulonephritis (29.4%) and hypertensive nephropathy (18.6%). Among the 348 deaths, cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death (32.8%), followed by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (21.6%). In both the multivariable time-dependent Cox model and the MSM, HD + HP was consistently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with HD, with HRs of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = 0.009) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = 0.030), respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 173 patients remained in each group with improved baseline balance. In the propensity score-matched cohort, Simon-Makuch analyses further supported a protective association of HD + HP with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with HD (Mantel-Byar test, P = 0.032 and P = 0.003, respectively).

conclusionIn this single-center retrospective cohort of patients receiving MHD, cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death. HD + HP therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality in time-dependent Cox regression and MSM-based weighted analyses, and with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in propensity score-matched Simon-Makuch analyses. These findings suggest a potential survival benefit of adjunctive HP.

Indexed as

HemoperfusionKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAll-cause mortalityCardiovascular mortalityHemoperfusionMaintenance hemodialysisMarginal structural modelPropensity score matchingSimon-Makuch curveTime-dependent cox regression

Identifiers

PMID42298491
PMCPMC13411991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.