ArticleBMC public health2026
A cross-sectional study on disaster adaptation and resilience among residents in Guangdong Province, China and analysis of its influencing factors.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn disaster-prone areas, residents' disaster adaptation and resilience are important components of community resilience. This study aimed to assess the level of disaster adaptation and resilience among residents and to analyze its influencing factors.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Guangdong Province, China, from November 2023 to July 2024. A total of 3,217 residents were recruited using a purposive convenience sampling method with geographic quotas. Due to the overrepresentation of females in the sample, post-stratification weighting was applied to adjust for gender imbalance. Disaster adaptation and resilience levels were assessed using the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale. The total scores were categorized into four levels based on quartiles (P
resultsA total of 3,181 valid questionnaires were collected in this survey, yielding an effective response rate of 98.88%. After weighting, the final sample size was 3,182. The total disaster adaptation and resilience score was 115.61 ± 36.36, and the item mean score was 2.57 ± 0.81, indicating a relatively upper-middle level based on the quartile classification (P
conclusionsThis study provides scientific evidence for improving disaster adaptation and resilience among residents in disaster-prone coastal areas of China and for developing public health intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.