ArticleGut pathogens2026
Carbadox, a veterinary growth promoter exhibits anticlostridial activity through induction of oxidative stress in Clostridioides difficile.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClostridioides difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients and is classified as an urgent public health threat. Current therapies, while effective, are limited by antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, treatment failure, and high recurrence rates, underscoring the need for novel therapeutics. Carbadox (CRX), an antibacterial growth promoter, has recently been identified as a potential anti-C. difficile inhibitor. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the anti-C. difficile activity, mechanism of action, and in vivo efficacy of CRX.
methodsCRX activity was assessed against a diverse panel of clinical C. difficile isolates using MIC determination, time-kill kinetics, and post-antibiotic effect assays. Its effects on toxin production were evaluated at subinhibitory concentrations, while post-germination vegetative growth was assessed under germination-permissive conditions at bactericidal concentrations. Mechanistic studies included macromolecular synthesis assays, reactive oxygen species (ROS) quantification, and antioxidant rescue experiments. Potential drug interactions were tested in combination assays with standard-of-care agents. Finally, the efficacy of CRX was examined in both acute and recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) mouse models.
resultsCRX demonstrated potent in vitro activity, inhibiting 50% of clinical isolates at an MIC₅₀ of 1 µg/mL. In time-kill assays, CRX rapidly cleared high bacterial inoculum within 4 h and displayed a prolonged post-antibiotic effect of up to 14 h. At subinhibitory concentrations, CRX significantly reduced toxin production compared with vancomycin, while at bactericidal concentrations it suppressed vegetative growth following spore germination. Mechanistic analysis revealed marked inhibition of DNA synthesis and increased oxidative stress-associated DNA damage signals, which was reversed by N-acetyl-L-cysteine supplementation. In vivo, CRX showed no recurrence among mice surviving to the end of therapy in both CRX treatment regimens, outperforming vancomycin in relapse prevention.
conclusionCRX exhibits strong anti-C. difficile activity through DNA synthesis inhibition and increased oxidative stress-associated DNA damage, coupled with suppression of toxin production and inhibition of vegetative growth post-spore germination. Its efficacy in both acute and recurrent CDI mouse models highlights CRX as a useful proof-of-concept scaffold for the development of safer analogs targeting C. difficile. Further optimization and safety evaluation will be essential to advance its translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.