ReviewInflammation and regeneration2026
Modeling striatal development and disease with human pluripotent stem cells.
Review in Inflammation and regeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The striatum plays a central role in motor control, cognition, reward processing, and habit formation, and its dysfunction is implicated in a broad spectrum of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although animal models have provided important insights into striatal development and disease mechanisms, species-specific differences in cellular composition, developmental timing, and circuit organization limit their translational relevance to the human brain. In this context, human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), including embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, have emerged as valuable platforms for modeling human striatal development and pathology in vitro. In this review, we summarize current approaches for generating striatal cell types from PSCs, with a particular focus on medium spiny neurons (MSNs), the principal projection neurons of the striatum. We discuss key developmental principles underlying dorsal and ventral striatal specification and highlight the protracted maturation of human MSNs, which may contribute to human-specific disease vulnerability. Advances in differentiation strategies, including small molecule-based patterning, transcription factor-driven induction, and three-dimensional organoid and assembloid systems, have progressively improved the efficiency, reproducibility, and cellular complexity of PSC-derived striatal models. We further review applications of PSC-derived striatal systems in disease modeling, noting that most studies to date have focused on Huntington's disease, where these models have revealed early developmental, transcriptional, synaptic, and network-level abnormalities. More recent studies have begun to extend these approaches to other neurological conditions and to incorporate circuit-level analyses using cortico-striatal assembloids. In parallel, the growing availability of single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomic datasets from the human striatum provides powerful reference frameworks for benchmarking the identity and maturation state of PSC-derived striatal cells. Finally, we discuss current challenges and limitations of PSC-based striatal models, including incomplete maturation, limited representation of non-neuronal cell types, and restricted applicability to psychiatric disorders. We propose that continued integration of developmental biology, public multi-omics resources, and advanced in vitro modeling strategies will be essential for advancing human striatal models and expanding their utility in translational neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.