ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
"When Rest Feels Wrong": A Qualitative Study of Rest Intolerance Among Nursing Interns and Implications for Workforce Resilience.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "When Rest Feels Wrong": A Qualitative Study of Rest Intolerance Among Nursing Interns and Implications for Workforce Resilience.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the psychological experience and underlying mechanisms of "rest intolerance" among nursing interns.
backgroundEffective recovery is essential for preventing burnout and ensuring patient safety. However, nursing interns often experience "rest intolerance", a paradoxical psychological state where resting induces distress rather than recovery. As interns represent the future pipeline of the nursing workforce, understanding this phenomenon is critical for managers aiming to build resilient teams and reduce early-career attrition.
designA qualitative interpretive phenomenological study.
methodsTwenty-one nursing interns were recruited via purposive sampling. Data collected through semi-structured interviews were analyzed using Colaizzi's method.
resultsSix themes and fourteen subthemes emerged. Participants described rest intolerance as involving four interrelated psychological experiences: (Theme 1) maladaptive cognitive ruminations (obsessive thinking and guilt regarding downtime); (Theme 2) toxic social comparison (viewing peers' activity as a benchmark for self-worth); (Theme 3) distorted professional identity (equating rest with laziness or lack of commitment); and (Theme 4) psychological inability to disengage (passive anxiety states). Participants attributed these states to two primary systemic stressors: (Theme 5) transitional shock and (Theme 6) task-time resource imbalance.
conclusionsInterns suffer a "recovery deficit" associated with a cultural and psychological inability to accept rest, which may contribute to burnout and turnover. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Findings suggest that simply providing time off may be insufficient if organizational culture stigmatizes rest. Accordingly, nurse managers and educators could (1) move beyond resilience training to address "rest guilt" explicitly; (2) model healthy recovery behaviors to help dismantle "hustle culture" in clinical wards; and (3) structure internships to reduce the task-time imbalance that appears to trigger cognitive dissonance during downtime. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This research did not involve patient or public participation in its design, conduct, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation. No patients or members of the public were involved in the development of the research question, interpretation of results, or dissemination of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.