ReviewGland surgery2026
Essentials for optimizing outcomes in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast conservation therapy in the setting of breast cancer has been shown to be a safe method for oncologic treatment in certain patients. However, lumpectomy and radiation have historically been associated with contour deformity, asymmetry, and suboptimal aesthetic outcomes. Oncoplastic breast reconstruction is an approach to breast-conserving surgery that includes reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects in order to minimize the deformity caused by treatment. These techniques serve to optimize breast aesthetics and symmetry in the oncologic setting and have improved patient satisfaction in the setting of breast conservation. There are several key points in the planning and execution of oncoplastic surgery as well as secondary procedures to further improve outcomes. Here, the authors present an overview of patient selection, multidisciplinary planning, and surgical technique for primary and secondary reconstruction, with a focus on specific methods of improving outcomes with autologous fat transfer. This review includes an overview of the literature focusing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as these play an important role in a surgeon's postoperative assessment of oncoplastic breast reconstruction. Overall, patient satisfaction is high and the oncologic integrity is preserved. Clinical cases are used to illustrate conceptual framework, pertinent anatomy of various techniques, and preoperative and postoperative comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.