Evidence mapPaperPMID 42299294Full record

ReviewGland surgery2026

Essentials for optimizing outcomes in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.

Martin Morris, Kanad Ghosh, Summer E Hanson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin MorrisDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kanad GhoshDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Summer E HansonDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-9819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy in the setting of breast cancer has been shown to be a safe method for oncologic treatment in certain patients. However, lumpectomy and radiation have historically been associated with contour deformity, asymmetry, and suboptimal aesthetic outcomes. Oncoplastic breast reconstruction is an approach to breast-conserving surgery that includes reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects in order to minimize the deformity caused by treatment. These techniques serve to optimize breast aesthetics and symmetry in the oncologic setting and have improved patient satisfaction in the setting of breast conservation. There are several key points in the planning and execution of oncoplastic surgery as well as secondary procedures to further improve outcomes. Here, the authors present an overview of patient selection, multidisciplinary planning, and surgical technique for primary and secondary reconstruction, with a focus on specific methods of improving outcomes with autologous fat transfer. This review includes an overview of the literature focusing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as these play an important role in a surgeon's postoperative assessment of oncoplastic breast reconstruction. Overall, patient satisfaction is high and the oncologic integrity is preserved. Clinical cases are used to illustrate conceptual framework, pertinent anatomy of various techniques, and preoperative and postoperative comparisons.

Indexed as

breast cancer reconstructionbreast conservation therapyOncoplastic reconstructionpatient-reported outcomes (PROs)survivorship

Identifiers

PMID42299294
PMCPMC13264767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.