ArticleClinical interventions in aging2026
Loneliness Prevalence and Correlates Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan: Clinical Utility of Brief Screening Measures.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Loneliness is a growing public health concern among older adults. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of loneliness among community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan and compared the performance of three loneliness measurement tools. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults aged ≥65 years recruited from community centers in Southern Taiwan. Loneliness was assessed using the UCLA-LS-20, UCLA-LS-3, and a single-item direct measure. Psychological and health-related variables included LSNS-6, GDS-15, GAD-7, and EQ-5D-5L. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with loneliness, and ROC analysis was performed to compare the discriminatory performance of the three instruments. Results: Among 186 participants, the prevalence of loneliness ranged from 18% to 27% depending on the instrument used. Higher GDS-15 scores were consistently associated with loneliness across all models. Other associated factors included social network size, living arrangement, anxiety symptoms, and self-rated health. The models using the UCLA-LS-3 and single-item measure showed high AUC values (0.9005 and 0.8988, respectively), and the model using the UCLA-LS-20 also demonstrated good model-specific predictive performance (AUC=0.8123). Conclusion: Loneliness is common among older adults in Taiwan. Brief measures, such as the UCLA-LS-3 and single-item question, may be practical for community-based loneliness screening, and the UCLA-LS-20 remains useful for more comprehensive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.