ArticleMedicine2026
Mechanism of afatinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer patients with nonclassical EGFR mutations: A multicenter, retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, but resistance inevitably develops. While resistance mechanisms in classical mutations are well studied, those in nonclassical mutations remain unclear. As a widely used EGFR-TKI, afatinib's resistance mechanisms in nonclassical mutations warrant further investigation to improve clinical outcomes. This study included NSCLC patients from multiple hospitals with nonclassical mutations who were finally resistant to afatinib. Baseline information and samples, including peripheral blood, tissue, and pleural fluid, were obtained for panel gene testing to identify potential gene mutations of resistance. A total of 21 eligible patients were included in this study. EGFR-related gene mutations accounted for 29.7% of all mutations, with TP53 accounting for 16.6%, other genes accounting for 41.5%, and MET amplification 2.7%. What we found different from classical mutations was that T790M mutation was the highest proportion in this study, followed by A767V, L858R, R776G. Concretely, T790M accounted for 7.8%, while A767V, L858R, R776G for 4.8% each, then NF1, CDK4 amplification and ALK accounted for 3.3%, 3.2% and 2.4%, respectively. This study represents the latest investigation of resistance mechanisms to afatinib in NSCLC patients with nonclassical mutations. The mechanism of resistance to EGFR-TKI in this study was discovered different from that of patients with classical mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.