ArticleAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2026
A Systematic Review of Post-Procedural Rehabilitation Protocols following Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy and Ultrasonic Debridement for Gluteal, Proximal Hamstring, and Patellar Tendinopathy.
Article in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePercutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) and ultrasonic debridement (UD) are minimally invasive interventions for the management of chronic tendinopathy. Despite their increasing use, no standardized, evidence-based rehabilitation guidelines currently exist to direct clinicians in post-procedural management. This systematic review aimed to characterize and synthesize reported rehabilitation protocols following PNT and UD for patellar, proximal hamstring, and gluteal tendinopathies.
designSystematic Review.
resultsTwenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with patellar tendon procedures (n=13) being the most common, followed by gluteal (n=6), proximal hamstring (n=3), and multi-tendon protocols (n=5). Of the included studies, 21 (78%) utilized percutaneous needle tenotomy (PNT) and six (22%) used ultrasound debridement or Tenex. Exercise restrictions were mandated in 19 studies (70%), while 12 (44%) provided a detailed, structured rehabilitation program, frequently emphasizing eccentric loading for patellar and hamstring tendons. Weight-bearing limitations were uncommon, appearing in only three studies (11%). Fifteen studies (56%) combined the procedure with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Pharmacological protocols also showed high variance, with NSAID restrictions ranging from 1 to 28 days and corticosteroid avoidance lasting between 10 days and one year. Overall, substantial variability remains regarding recommended activity progression, exercise initiation, and mechanical loading strategies across current research.
conclusionPNT and UD appear effective for managing refractory tendinopathy, yet post-procedure rehabilitation guidelines remain inconsistent and supported by limited high-quality evidence. Future research should aim to identify key variables that guide individualized rehabilitation progressions, optimizing recovery timelines, and facilitating safe and efficient return to activity following PNT and UD procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.