ReviewACR open rheumatology2026
Positive and Negative Cardiovascular Effects of JAK Inhibitors in Inflammation.
Review in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic inflammation, characteristic of many autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), is an independent driver of accelerated cardiovascular (CV) risk, primarily through proinflammatory cytokines that induce atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Although biologic therapies (tumor necrosis factor [TNF], interleukin [IL]-6, or IL-1 inhibitors) improve both clinical manifestations and CV outcomes, JAK inhibitors (JAKi) present a paradox. JAKi provide potent systemic inflammation control, sometimes superior to biologic therapies, this effect does not translate into a proportional CV risk reduction in all patients. Instead, JAKi have been linked to increased adverse CV events in high-risk patient populations with RA, resulting in a Food and Drug Administration safety warning. Conversely, JAKi show therapeutic benefit in patients with MPNs. In MPNs, JAKi specifically target the JAK2 mutation, reducing blood cell proliferation and the associated prothrombotic state. This review compares the distinct biologic mechanisms underlying this JAKi CV paradox, contrasting the JAK2 mutation-driven pathology in MPNs with the widespread cytokine-driven alterations in inflammatory diseases. In the latter, the observed CV risk might stem from failure of JAKi to fully inhibit prothrombotic pathways induced by cytokines (TNF and IL-17) and the potential dose-related vascular toxicity. Understanding these binary effects will provide new insights into the divergent CV impact of JAKi.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.