Evidence mapPaperPMID 42300713Full record

ReviewACR open rheumatology2026

Positive and Negative Cardiovascular Effects of JAK Inhibitors in Inflammation.

Aliki Zavoriti, Pierre Miossec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aliki ZavoritiImmunogenomics and Inflammation Research Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Pierre MiossecImmunogenomics and Inflammation Research Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-6346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic inflammation, characteristic of many autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), is an independent driver of accelerated cardiovascular (CV) risk, primarily through proinflammatory cytokines that induce atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Although biologic therapies (tumor necrosis factor [TNF], interleukin [IL]-6, or IL-1 inhibitors) improve both clinical manifestations and CV outcomes, JAK inhibitors (JAKi) present a paradox. JAKi provide potent systemic inflammation control, sometimes superior to biologic therapies, this effect does not translate into a proportional CV risk reduction in all patients. Instead, JAKi have been linked to increased adverse CV events in high-risk patient populations with RA, resulting in a Food and Drug Administration safety warning. Conversely, JAKi show therapeutic benefit in patients with MPNs. In MPNs, JAKi specifically target the JAK2 mutation, reducing blood cell proliferation and the associated prothrombotic state. This review compares the distinct biologic mechanisms underlying this JAKi CV paradox, contrasting the JAK2 mutation-driven pathology in MPNs with the widespread cytokine-driven alterations in inflammatory diseases. In the latter, the observed CV risk might stem from failure of JAKi to fully inhibit prothrombotic pathways induced by cytokines (TNF and IL-17) and the potential dose-related vascular toxicity. Understanding these binary effects will provide new insights into the divergent CV impact of JAKi.

Identifiers

PMID42300713
PMCPMC13270778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.