Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42301301›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2026

Assessing the variation of DNA damage response of individual human cells exposed to photon radiation.

Magdalena Płódowska, Dominika Drzazga, Aneta Węgierek-Ciuk, Przemysław Szyc, Beata Brzozowska, Paweł Wołowiec, Prabodha Kumar Meher, Halina Lisowska, Andrzej Wojcik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Magdalena PłódowskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Dominika DrzazgaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Aneta Węgierek-CiukDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Przemysław SzycBiomedical Physics Division, Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata BrzozowskaBiomedical Physics Division, Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł WołowiecDepartment of Medical Physics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Prabodha Kumar Meher
Halina LisowskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Andrzej WojcikDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland. andrzej.wojcik@su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3951-774X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual cells of the same type and in the same position in the cell cycle show stochastic cell-to-cell variability (noise) in gene and protein expression, even under the same environmental conditions. The aim of the study was to test if radiation-induced DNA damage response of cells shows noise, on top of the randomly distributed DNA damage. This was tested by comparing the frequency of DNA repair foci in sister nuclei of binucleated cells (intra BNC variability) and nuclei of two BNC (inter BNC variability). Inter cell variability was also measured for mononucleated cells (MNC). Binucleation was induced in U2OS cells by cytochalasin B. Cells were exposed to 2 Gy of photons, 53BP1 and γH2AX foci were visualised and counted in nuclei of binucleated and mononucleated cells 30, 60, 120 and 180 min post exposure. Coefficients of variation were calculated as indicators of variability. For both types of foci, the frequencies observed in sister nuclei within BNC were positively correlated and exhibited significantly lower variation compared to the variability measured between single nuclei from randomly paired BNC. The contribution of noise to the total variability was 28% for 53BP1 foci and 50% for γH2AX foci. The results demonstrate that the variability of focus frequency observed in nuclei of BNC results from a combination of noise and random damage variability.

Indexed as

DNA DamagePhotonsCell Line, TumorCell NucleusDNA RepairHistonesHumansTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1H2AX protein, humanHistonesTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DNA damageDNA repairIonising radiationSingle cell variability

Identifiers

PMID42301301
PMCPMC13486072

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.