ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2026
Assessing the variation of DNA damage response of individual human cells exposed to photon radiation.
Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual cells of the same type and in the same position in the cell cycle show stochastic cell-to-cell variability (noise) in gene and protein expression, even under the same environmental conditions. The aim of the study was to test if radiation-induced DNA damage response of cells shows noise, on top of the randomly distributed DNA damage. This was tested by comparing the frequency of DNA repair foci in sister nuclei of binucleated cells (intra BNC variability) and nuclei of two BNC (inter BNC variability). Inter cell variability was also measured for mononucleated cells (MNC). Binucleation was induced in U2OS cells by cytochalasin B. Cells were exposed to 2 Gy of photons, 53BP1 and γH2AX foci were visualised and counted in nuclei of binucleated and mononucleated cells 30, 60, 120 and 180 min post exposure. Coefficients of variation were calculated as indicators of variability. For both types of foci, the frequencies observed in sister nuclei within BNC were positively correlated and exhibited significantly lower variation compared to the variability measured between single nuclei from randomly paired BNC. The contribution of noise to the total variability was 28% for 53BP1 foci and 50% for γH2AX foci. The results demonstrate that the variability of focus frequency observed in nuclei of BNC results from a combination of noise and random damage variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.