ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for neurodevelopmental disorders in children.
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate the use of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in children with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly the value of fractional anisotropy (FA) in assessing neurological dysfunction. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 91 children with neurodevelopmental disorders and 21 children without neurodevelopmental disorders were enrolled and underwent DTI.
resultsThe FA values were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in both the globus pallidus and the posterior limb of the internal capsule in the neurodevelopmental disorder groups (193.08 ± 31.10 and 480.02 ± 29.08 in the mild-moderate, 183.26 ± 21.89 and 469.54 ± 27.02 in the severe, and 161.28 ± 16.13 and 407.18 ± 42.27 in the extremely severe subgroups, respectively) compared to the control group (206.12 ± 12.05 for the globus pallidus and 487.12 ± 21.06 for the posterior limb). The FA values were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in the globus pallidus (165.33 ± 19.02) and the posterior limb of the internal capsule (441.21 ± 51.23) in the neurodevelopmental disorder group compared with the control group (189.05 ± 29.20 for the globus pallidus and 492.57 ± 28.10 for the posterior limb).
conclusionThe use of DTI provides critical insights into neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Changes in FA in the globus pallidus and posterior limb of the internal capsule are closely associated with the severity of neurological dysfunction and may serve as effective biomarkers for assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301309What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.