ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Shiga toxin-centered pathophysiology defines the therapeutic limits of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EHEC infection is a toxin-driven systemic disease primarily mediated by the production of Shiga toxin (Stx). Stx is encoded by lysogenic bacteriophages, and SOS-linked prophage induction can increase toxin production in response to environmental or therapeutic stimuli. Once expressed, the toxin rapidly disseminates systemically and binds to cells expressing the globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) receptor. The toxin is then internalized via retrograde intracellular trafficking pathways, ultimately causing inhibition of protein synthesis. These characteristics impose a limited therapeutic window for effective intervention. As a consequence of this pathophysiological framework, current clinical management strategies for EHEC infection remain confined to supportive care. This includes fluid and electrolyte management and organ support, including dialysis and transfusion, in cases complicated by hemolytic uremic syndrome. Antimicrobial therapies that induce the SOS response are mismatched with EHEC pathophysiology and may worsen disease severity by triggering phage activation and toxin expression. The inability to use certain antibiotics in EHEC infection reflects the unique pathophysiological characteristics of the disease. This review considers EHEC infection as a systemic toxigenic disorder and examines Stx-centered pathophysiological constraints. Furthermore, it evaluates the limitations of current therapeutic strategies and examines experimental therapeutic approaches based on the unique pathophysiology of EHEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42301365What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.