ReviewDiscover oncology2026
The potential utility of in-silico approach in identifying phytochemicals against various targets for the management of lung cancer.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on novel treatment approaches is crucial for lung cancer, because it is one of the most common and aggressive malignancies with high mortality in the world. The potential advantages of using in silico methods to find phytochemicals for lung cancer treatment have been summarized in this review. This also highlights the various computational tools, such as ADMET profiling, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and machine learning algorithms, involved in the identification of potential phyto-constituents for lung cancer therapy. Key molecular targets that were assessed against a range of phytochemicals that showed multi-target binding and promising pharmacokinetic properties included EGFR, KRAS, ALK, and PD-L1. Prominent compounds such as quercetin, curcumin, and luteolin showed notable interactions with carcinogenic pathways, tumor microenvironment modulators, and apoptosis inducers. Mechanistic understanding, high-throughput screening, and economical drug development were made possible by this computational approach. This review demonstrates the potential utility of in silico techniques to bridge the gap between precision oncology and traditional medicine, as well as the intriguing function of phytochemicals as supplemental medicines in lung cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.