Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42302018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Developing internationally agreed core indicators for surveillance of preconception health: protocol for a consensus study.

Danielle Schoenaker, Jennifer Hall, Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi, Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Palwende R Boua, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Tamar Chitashvili, Ilse Delbaere, Anastasia Demidova, Kassahun Fikadu and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Danielle SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X
Jennifer HallEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-9568
Ghadir Fakhri Al-JayyousiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-1693
Ana Luiza Vilela BorgesSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Palwende R BouaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-2665
Jerry Kok Yen ChanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Tamar ChitashviliJohn Snow International (JSI), Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1848-7879
Ilse DelbaereDepartment of Healthcare, VIVES University of Applied Sciences, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Anastasia DemidovaDivision of Care in Long Term Conditions, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kassahun FikaduDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Sarah FisherPublic contributor, United Kingdom.
Avishek HazraPopulation Council Consulting, New Delhi, India.
Sharon JamesSPHERE Centre of Research Excellence in Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health in Primary Care, Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-3447
Chee Wai KuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-3005
Eri MaedaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Zahid MemonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Daniel MunblitDivision of Care in Long Term Conditions, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Annemarie MuldersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Zivai MuriraUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Regional Office for South Asia (ROSA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Wendy V NormanDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7882
Amy OglePreconception Education Partnership, United States of America.
Vani SethiUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Regional Office for South Asia (ROSA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hessa Ibrahim ShahbicPrimary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar.
Nadira Sultana KakolyDepartment of Public Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sarah VerbiestSchools of Social Work and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Judith StephensonEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
International Core Indicators for Preconception Health and Equity (iCIPHE) Alliance

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions and policies to optimise preconception health are increasing internationally. This stems from growing recognition that improving preconception health can improve maternal and child health outcomes and advance equity by reducing inequalities and address inequities for people of reproductive age and any children they may have. Interventions and policies should be evaluated through population-level surveillance of preconception health to inform the development of new initiatives, monitor effectiveness, and support advocacy for international adoption of successful strategies. However, there is currently no internationally agreed set of preconception health indicators available and suitable for international surveillance. The International Core Indicators for Preconception Health and Equity (iCIPHE) Alliance was established to address this gap.

aimTo prioritise core indicators that can be used in low-, middle- and high-income countries for surveillance of preconception health and equity.

methodsWe held two workshops with the iCIPHE Alliance (multi-sectoral stakeholders from low-, middle- and high-income countries) to inform the design of this international consensus study. The development of core indicators will consist of three steps: (1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate surveillance indicators, and defining principles for scoring the importance of each indicator, through a literature review, public involvement, and workshops with iCIPHE Alliance members; (2) scoring each candidate indicator in terms of its importance for surveillance through a two-round Delphi survey among study participants; and (3) agreeing on the final core indicators through a series of consensus meetings with a selected group of study participants. We will recruit study participants from all World Health Organization (WHO) regions across four stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (who do not belong to any of the other stakeholder groups); health and social care professionals; policy and programme professionals; and researchers. DISSEMINATION: We will disseminate the priority core indicators through peer-reviewed publication, lay summaries, policy briefs and presentations. An implementation strategy, to enable monitoring of inequalities, inequities, and changes in preconception health over time within and between countries, will be developed with relevant national and international organisations to inform next steps.

Indexed as

Population SurveillancePreconception CareConsensusFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42302018
PMCPMC13271456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.