ArticlePloS one2026
Data subdivision approach enhances machine learning-based mortality prediction in pediatric ICU patients.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting metabolic syndrome in adolescents from device-measured 24-h movement behaviors: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate machine learning-based models for predicting all-cause mortality in pediatric ICU patients using comprehensive biochemical panels, with a focus on addressing missing data and class imbalance. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on a publicly available PICU dataset comprising 8,629 patients aged 28 days to 18 years. Twenty-two biochemical variables measured on the first PICU day were analyzed. Missing values were addressed using Multiple Imputation. Lasso regression was applied for feature selection. Models were trained using 5-fold cross-validation with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Two ML-based imbalance-handling strategies, stacking ensemble and data subdivision were evaluated. Pairwise DeLong tests were used to compare AUC performance across models.
resultsAmong the 8,629 included patients, there were 476 non-survivors (5.5 percent). Multiple imputation followed by SMOTE improved model performance across all algorithms. The single-model classifiers achieved AUC-ROC values of 0.82 (Random Forest), 0.79 (CatBoost), 0.83 (Extra Trees), and 0.79 (Logistic Regression). The stacking ensemble demonstrated the best overall performance, with an AUC-ROC of 0.88 and an AUC-PRC of 0.45. The data subdivision approaches also produced strong discriminative performance, achieving AUC-ROC value up to 0.83 for three-subdivision, and 0.82 for five-subdivision strategies. Calibration analysis showed that the stacking model achieved the lowest Brier score (0.04), indicating superior probabilistic accuracy compared with individual classifiers. Feature importance analyses across all MI-based models consistently highlighted coagulation markers (D-dimer, reference TT, PTT, INR), electrolytes (chloride, potassium, sodium), and metabolic and organ-dysfunction indicators (AST, ALT, creatinine) as key predictors of mortality.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that ensemble stacking is a more effective strategy than data subdivision for addressing class imbalance in PICU mortality prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.