SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026
Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExperiencing weight stigmatization is linked to maladaptive eating, poorer mental health, and increased risk of weight gain, potentially impacting metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize patient experiences of weight stigmatization before and after MBS and to examine the association of presurgical weight stigma on postsurgical weight loss.
methodsThis preregistered study followed PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched through March 2025; eligible studies included published articles and dissertations/theses available in English that quantitatively measured presurgical weight stigma among MBS samples and included relevant outcomes. Meta-analyses utilized random effects models with change scores converted to Hedge's g and associations between presurgical experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight change converted to coefficient r.
resultsForty-one studies were included, with 36 reporting on experienced weight stigma change pre- to post-MBS and 10 studies reporting on the relationship between pre-MBS experienced weight stigma and post-MBS weight loss.
conclusionsResults revealed weight stigmatization decreased substantially after MBS (6-12 months, g = 1.28; 13-24 months, g = 1.16; 25-36 months, g = 1.26). Presurgical weight stigma was not associated with weight loss post-surgery (r = 0.05). Findings are limited by minimal studies reporting on longer term relationships between baseline stigma, post-MBS weight loss, and additional health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.