ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Combined emission ratiometry and motion tracking for optical mapping of contracting hearts: Validation with monophasic action potentials.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac optical mapping in fully contracting hearts is limited by motion artefacts, leading most investigations to rely on excitation-contraction uncoupling despite its impact on physiological relevance. Although motion tracking and ratiometric imaging have each been used to reduce motion artefacts, and their combined use has been demonstrated with excitation ratiometry, systematic validation of emission ratiometry combined with motion tracking against an established electrophysiological reference remains limited. In this study, we integrated emission ratiometry with two-dimensional, marker-free motion tracking to suppress motion-related artefacts during optical mapping of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, leveraging the advantage that emission ratiometry derives both signals from the same excitation pathway and thereby reduces sensitivity to motion-related photometric fluctuations in fluorescence intensity. Motion-corrected optical action potentials were quantitatively validated against simultaneously recorded monophasic action potentials (MAPs), with optical signals extracted from regions adjacent to the MAP electrode. Compared with raw recordings and with either method applied alone, the combined approach produced the closest agreement with MAP-derived repolarization measurements. Bland-Altman analysis indicated no systematic bias at APD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.