Evidence mapPaperPMID 42303370Full record

ReviewAddiction biology2026

Learning Mechanisms in Alcohol Use Disorders.

Andreas Heinz, Selin Icoez, Yvonne Treusch, Gaetano di Chiara, Melissa G Halil

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addiction biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HeinzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical School and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5405-9065
Selin IcoezDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany.
Yvonne TreuschDepartment of Health and Social Affairs, HSD University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.
Gaetano di ChiaraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy.
Melissa G HalilDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-7883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian and operant learning mechanisms promote and maintain alcohol intake despite aversive consequences. Here, we review the evidence for drug-associated modifications of basic learning mechanisms during the initiation and maintenance of alcohol use disorders in humans. We discuss how neuroadaptive effects elicited by chronic alcohol intake in the so-called brain reward system can bias learning and decision making towards drug consumption and contribute to the relapse risk after detoxification. Robustness of results and limitations of the respective neurobiological or imaging techniques are addressed. We opine that studying the effects of alcohol intake on Pavlovian and reinforcement learning can inform psychotherapeutic interventions and help to better understand some new neurobiological interventions. We argue that a focus on drug effects biassing basic learning mechanisms can help to reduce the stigma associated with drug consumption and emphasize behavioural and neurobiological interventions that take individual learning mechanisms into account when promoting alternative coping strategies.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAlcohol-Related DisordersLearningAnimalsBrainConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantHumansReinforcement, PsychologyRewardalcohol use disordersbehavioural interventions in addictiondopamine dysregulationneuroadaptation in addictionreward learning mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID42303370
PMCPMC13271829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.