Evidence mapPaperPMID 42303875Full record

ArticleCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Digital Tools to Support Mental Health in Later Life: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.

Melanie Stowell, Rosie Dobson, Noah Bunkley, Judith McCool, Vili Nosa, Robyn Whittaker

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melanie StowellSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. melanie.stowell@auckland.ac.nz.
Rosie DobsonSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Noah BunkleySchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Judith McCoolSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Vili NosaSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Robyn WhittakerSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Building 507, Grafton Campus, 28 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis scoping review synthesises existing evidence from systematic reviews on the effectiveness and implementation of digital mental health interventions among community-dwelling older adults. RECENT

findingsTwenty-one systematic reviews were included. Results showed that a range of digital tools demonstrate potential to improve common mental health and psychosocial symptoms among older adults, with most evidence concentrating on digital tools to improve depressive symptoms. However, reviews' findings were frequently mixed and accompanied with cautions that primary evidence under-reported key elements such as theoretical underpinnings, intervention design process, participant demographics, intervention acceptability and usability, participant retention, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. More rigorous research and reporting are needed to understand the mechanisms underpinning effective digital mental health interventions for older adults and how they might mitigate the age-related digital divide in mental health services.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesAgedDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansTelemedicineDigital healthMental healthOlder adultsPsychosocial healthTechnology interventionsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42303875
PMCPMC13272217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.